http://elists.resynthesize.com Electronic Music Mailing List Archives - sc-users en-us http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1950095/ 2008-05-17 04:25:46 >> >> >> It is possible, to a certain egree. Have a look at the single sample >> delay example in the examples folder. >> -- >That looks a little scary, but yes, it looks possible. Not neat, but >possible. Well, it could be made much neater if we had a local buffer allocation. Then one could encapsulate some of this. > >Josh > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> . >> _______________________________________________ >> sc-users mailing list >> sc-users@create.ucsb.edu >> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users > >****************************************** >/* Joshua D. Par]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1950094/ 2008-05-17 04:24:37 nonprivate schrieb: >> so how could this work in practice? would it be possible to compile the >> synthdef files beforehand using the language, then somehow get these to >> load into the plugin, then you would just send the OSC commands by some >> method - java or something. it would be cool (or maybe even essential) >> for the plugin to be able to load synthdefs from remote paths, not to >> mention soundfiles and the like. >> > > well, i still don't quite get what this thread is going to be about ... im not sure either :) is he talking about the SC ]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1950028/ 2008-05-17 12:51:22 >>>>> > Postdoctoral Position with the Princeton Laptop Orchestra (PLOrK) > > The Princeton University Department of Music invites applications > for a 12-month post-doctoral appointment (July 1, 2008-June 30, > 2009) with the Princeton Laptop Orchestra (PLOrk; for more > informat]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949893/ 2008-05-16 04:41:53 so how could this work in practice? would it be possible to compile the > synthdef files beforehand using the language, then somehow get these to > load into the plugin, then you would just send the OSC commands by some > method - java or something. it would be cool (or maybe even essential) > for the plugin to be able to load synthdefs from remote paths, not to > mention soundfiles and the like. > well, i still don't quite get what this thread is going to be about ... i've only copied this little processing example, which does what i believe Schell wants ]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949819/ 2008-05-16 01:49:04 Schell schrieb: > >> If sclang can listen on tcp, is it possible to send arbitrary sc code to >> sclang [via binary socket], have sclang interpret it and send that to >>]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949812/ 2008-05-16 01:28:46 > Pdef(~bsgroup) looks funny to me. was just a test since i was lost kinda when it didnt work. basically i just put the pdef im using into it Pdef(\i, Pbus(Pfx(Pdef(xyz), \distort)); _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@create.ucsb.edu http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users ]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949803/ 2008-05-16 01:17:36 Pbus might your friend. hm, but i did wrap a pbus around the pfx already to isolate it: Pdef(\i, Pbus(Pfx(Pdef(~bsgroup), \distort)); and it doesnt work:( _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@create.ucsb.edu http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users ]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949800/ 2008-05-16 01:16:24 ~bsgroup = Pgroup(i1); > Pdef(\i, Pbus(Pfx(Pdef(~bsgroup), \distort)); Pdef(~bsgroup) looks funny to me. Pdef usage should be Pdef(key, pattern), not Pdef(pattern). hjh -- James Harkins /// dewdrop world jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net http://www.dewdrop-world.net "Come said the Muse, Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted, Sing me the universal." -- Whitman _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list sc-users@create.ucsb.edu http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users ]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949782/ 2008-05-16 12:49:41 hi, im trying to use Pfx to add individual > effects to differnt pdefs, but its > seems not working, the fx takes over > the complete audiostream of other synths,too. > any explanation why it doesnt work would be very helpful. > thx > Pbus might your friend. stefan > > Pdef(\i1, Pbind( > > \dur, Prand([1/3, 2/3, 4/3, 2/3 , 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, 3]*0.5, inf), > \amp,1.4, > \octave, 0, > \scale, #[0,2,3,5,7] , \degree, x, > > \instrument,\bass > > )); > > ~bsgroup = Pgroup(i1); > Pdef(\i, Pbus(Pfx(Pdef(~bsgroup), \distort)); > > > SynthDef(\distort, ]]> http://elists.resynthesize.com/sc-users/2008/05/1949781/ 2008-05-16 12:47:22 If sclang can listen on tcp, is it possible to send arbitrary sc code to > sclang [via binary socket], have sclang interpret it and send that to > scsynth? It would be nice to be able to use the oop functionality of sc with > a graphical representation of it in as3. > hmm ... there has been a thread on sclang a few days - you maybe read that. i wouldn't try to go the sclang way, rather use osc-commands that go to scsynth directly. you can 'set' arguments of running synths or create new synth-instances - whatever you need. you can have the full power of sc sound-s]]>