Elists: mulch-discuss http://elists.resynthesize.com Electronic Music Mailing List Archives - mulch-discuss en-us [mulch] SWEDISH MULCHERS http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1949689/ 2008-05-16 10:10:20 Re: [mulch] AM driven installation. http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1948401/ 2008-05-14 02:14:29 [mulch] Bent Radio Orchestra @ EXPO 2008 http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1948215/ 2008-05-14 08:46:21 Re: [mulch] AM driven installation. http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1948144/ 2008-05-14 06:35:19 Re: [mulch] Sound 'leaking' thru to other channels...Help!? http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1948125/ 2008-05-14 05:43:44 > Hi >=20 ]]> [mulch] AM driven installation. http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1948109/ 2008-05-14 05:12:14 Re: [mulch] Re: AM 2.0 suggestion http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1947888/ 2008-05-13 09:35:24 I always thought it was Ben-SEE-na. you're not alone, that's the most common mispronunciation. bests Ross. --7Gwmyf-8uhm32bnw6iclokWChOhIz6Q7YFT-dMU Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ian Cozine >I always thought it was Ben-SEE-na. you're not alone, that's the most common mispronunciation. bests Ross. __._,_.___ ]]> [mulch] AM 2.0 suggestion http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1947885/ 2008-05-13 08:41:16 Re: [mulch] Re: AM 2.0 suggestion http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1947539/ 2008-05-13 09:39:58 > Hi Jon > > Thanks for the suggestion, and the clear explanation, but I can't see it ]]> [mulch] Re: AM 2.0 suggestion http://elists.resynthesize.com/mulch-discuss/2008/05/1947371/ 2008-05-13 04:43:13 > Hi Jon >=20 > Thanks for the suggestion, and the clear explanation, but I can't see it=20 > happening for version 2.0 >=20 > I'm not an expert on phonetic spelling, but ]]>