Elists: cecdiscuss http://elists.resynthesize.com Electronic Music Mailing List Archives - cecdiscuss en-us baladodiffusion / philosophie du bruit http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1950079/ 2008-05-17 03:30:27 JC Neslon email http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1950022/ 2008-05-17 12:39:11 Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949935/ 2008-05-16 07:22:08 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Synth=E9tiseur_ARIES_=281977=29_=E0_vendre?= http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949920/ 2008-05-16 05:52:02 Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949862/ 2008-05-16 03:27:43 > Thanks for your opinions Michael. I won't argue with you about them, or > debate them, as they are based upon an emotional sense of (your) > survival, and emotional issues do not open themselves to rational (sic) > debate. Emotional issues including such areas as belie]]> Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949826/ 2008-05-16 02:04:13 Re: IMMHV and Toronto plug http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949799/ 2008-05-16 01:13:51 In My Most Humble View, as a member of ERATUA (email readers against >the use of acronyms) ... > David Mooney: dmooney@city-net.com Maxine Heller: mheller@city-net.com Opaque Melodies: www.city-net.com/~moko/ ]]> Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/1969/12/1949775/ 1969-12-31 04:00:00 From: Suk-Jun Kim >Sent: May 16, 2008 2:50 PM >To: cec-conference@concordia.ca >Subject: Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) > > >> I think is remarkable how this discussion tends to veer into jokes, >> irony, and the like instead of actual ]]> Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949751/ 2008-05-16 11:50:53 I think is remarkable how this discussion tends to veer into jokes, > irony, and the like instead of actual argument. By any ordinary > rules of debate, this kind of move is -- a joke. Kundera said: "Jokes, anecdotes, funny stories: they are the best evidence that a sharp sense of the real and an imagination that ventures into the implausible can make a perfect pairing." > Ok, now I am prepared to put forward what I believe is a good > argument for the existence of objective norms in music. We are > living in a time of extreme ferment, musically. Thanks to the vast > st]]> Re: Objectivity (Was maybe we can discuss the definition of) http://elists.resynthesize.com/cecdiscuss/2008/05/1949733/ 2008-05-16 11:28:52