From: Mark Knecht ()
Date: May 2, 2008
Subject:
Re: Pre-License change LinuxSampler code
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Esben Stien wrote:
> "Mark Knecht" writes:
>
>
> > The GPL doesn't protect my 'interests' as a tester/contributor
> > bucause my name isn't listed in the code header.
>
> This is wrong. If you got contributions to the code base you are also
> a copyright holder. The law protects you here. This means they cannot
> change the license of the particular files you contributed to, without
> your consent or without removing your contributions. This is protected
> by law.
>
Well, the problem is that as a tester/contributor my contributions to
the project is direct but to the code is indirect. I never wrote a
line of code in LS and don't want anyone to think I did. However I
would strongly suggest that LS wouldn't have made nearly the progress
is did make in the time it did without all the work I did looking for
inconsistencies in how GigaStudio handled a specific gig file vs how
LS did. My contribution was to push them to make a product that
professional users of GSt would consider using. However, I wrote no
code and my name appears nowhere in any file, as is probably
appropriate.
>
> > I'm not personally sure what the FSF could really do for us on this
> > subject but I'd be interested in knowing.
>
> It's not up to the FSF, as long as they don't hold the copyright to
> the work.
>
>
> -- [EMAIL REMOVED] s a
> http://www. s t n m
> irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact [EMAIL REMOVED] e e [EMAIL REMOVED] n n
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> Linux-audio-user mailing list [EMAIL REMOVED] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list [EMAIL REMOVED] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user