From: Oeyvind Brandtsegg ()
Date: Dec 2, 2004
Subject:
Re: number precision
I think that it is highly unlikely that it would break excisting pieces,
because this parameter is barely usable for any purpose in the problematic register,
it even drops to zero under a certain threshold. But, of course, one can never guarantee that someone haven't used it as a feature.
Oeyvind
[EMAIL REMOVED] > Sent: 2004-12-02 13:09:54 CET [EMAIL REMOVED] > Subject: Re: [Csnd] number precision
>
> A very short glance at the code for fof/fof2 indeed shows that the
> increment is calculated by rounding down the increment to an integer.
> fund_inc = (long)(*fund * sicvt);
> form_inc = (long)(*form * sicvt);
> and the phase is maintained as a long.
>
> Before just changing this one does need to ask whether it would break
> existing pieces.
>
> ==John ffitch
> -- [EMAIL REMOVED] > (or to http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/cgi-bin/csound ) [EMAIL REMOVED] >
-- [EMAIL REMOVED] (or to http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/cgi-bin/csound ) [EMAIL REMOVED]