Electronic Music mailing list archives

Previous Message: Re: number precision
Next Message: Re: number precision

From: Victor Lazzarini ()
Date: Dec 2, 2004
Subject: Re: number precision

Perhaps this will need a code revision resulting in a different opcode.

Victor
At 12:09 02/12/2004, you wrote:
>A very short glance at the code for fof/fof2 indeed shows that the
>increment is calculated by rounding down the increment to an integer.
>     fund_inc = (long)(*fund * sicvt);
>     form_inc = (long)(*form * sicvt);
>and the phase is maintained as a long.
>
>Before just changing this one does need to ask whether it would break
>existing pieces.
>
>==John ffitch
>-- [EMAIL REMOVED] >               (or to http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/cgi-bin/csound ) [EMAIL REMOVED] 
Victor Lazzarini
Music Technology Laboratory
Music Department
National University of Ireland, Maynooth 

--  [EMAIL REMOVED]               (or to http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/cgi-bin/csound ) [EMAIL REMOVED] 

+ number precision Oeyvind Brandtsegg (12/01/04)
+---Re: number precision Prent Rodgers (12/01/04)
+---Re: number precision Victor Lazzarini (12/02/04)
+---Re: number precision Victor Lazzarini (12/02/04)

Previous Message: Re: number precision
Next Message: Re: number precision